March 06 2010

Trust and Confidence

Tagged Under : , ,

As I continue forward in my campaign, I am committed to what have become my everyday core values since taking the oath as a Special Agent with the United States Secret Service: duty, justice, honesty, loyalty and courage.  What I have discovered, during the course of my journey to represent the people of Hilton Head Island, is a reaffirmation of what initially motivated me to take on this charge – the voters’ lack of “trust and confidence” in their elected representatives.

This lack of trust and deepened skepticism toward politicians hit home during the past few weeks as my campaign conducted the necessary due diligence regarding the “1% Sales Tax Initiative.”   I am a fiscal conservative and while I hate the idea of a tax increase, I also believe strongly in the idea of “Home Rule”.  This is a Home Rule issue and something that should be dealt with locally.  If the tool is needed it is in the toolbox.

A true leader does not operate within a vacuum and a primary principle of leadership is the ability to listen.  I have personally spoken with many throughout our community and found very little support for an additional increase at this time.  For me, as a voter and resident of our community, the following provisions will need to be met and/or included before I can offer my support and advocacy of this initiative:

1. Final passage through the use of a “referendum”.  While I understand that, as an elected official, it would be my job to represent our community and make the tough decisions that reflect your values, I feel that this particular piece of legislation must be put before the electorate in order to provide the transparency needed at this time.

2. Our Chamber of Commerce and members of Town Council supporting this initiative need to take their argument to the people and clearly articulate the reason this increase is necessary, including full transparency of the details.  Showing this leadership will help restore faith in the process.

3. The provision currently included in the legislation regarding a mitigation in property taxes must be a 30% reduction and not “up to” 30%.  As a fiscal conservative, I believe we want this to be as “revenue neutral” as possible and a play on those words has only deepened the lack of trust in how this added revenue will be used.

4. The Chamber of Commerce must agree to NOT seek future discretionary funds available through the ATAX.

We are at a crossroads on Hilton Head Island and are working to identify who we are going to be tomorrow and how we will get there.  We need to work together, fully recognizing our collective mission – protecting what makes us unique and preparing for future prosperity.

December 02 2009

Challenging the Status Quo

Tagged Under : ,

Dear Friends,

We face a significant number of challenges in South Carolina! From out of control state spending and the compromise of “Home Rule” to a delicate balance of protecting our environment while stimulating economic development.

As you all know, I am challenging a three term incumbent whom often refers to his seniority as a positive for those he has been elected to represent.

A few words about seniority…. It is a long standing political myth that voters should re elect officials because their seniority is of benefit to the area represented.  In some cases seniority is a valid reason for reelection.  Seniority, like name recognition, should never be the only reason to vote for someone and should only be considered when added to important reasons such as hard evidence of effective representation.

Inadequate or even incompetent representation does not become acceptable because a person has somehow been reelected time after time.

The South Carolina House of Representatives has members who have less than 10 years of elected experience who are doing an outstanding job and should be reelected.  Their value in the House is because of their accomplishment – not their time in grade.

The South Carolina House of Representatives has members who are not doing a good job and should not be reelected no matter how many years they have occupied a seat.

Doing the people’s business is a privilege and should be taken seriously by both the office holder and the voter.  While a person’s resume is only a guide as to what they may do in the future, a solid resume of individual accomplishment in the past will almost always trump a history of talk and talk and more talk.

The status quo is clearly ineffective at ushering in the changes necessary to advance an agenda of true reform for the benefit of all.

Best Regards,

Andy